typical features a Content Management

Content management is a set of processes and technologies which help in supporting to collect or manage or publish information through any form or in any medium. Its process differs and varies depending upon the organization they deal with. Its goals and practices vary by the organizational governance structure and its mission which may vary in different ways. There is a system to maintain the content management which is known as Content Management System (CMS). It supports many advanced capabilities to help the content writers to manage and publish XML content. We need to narrow our list of tools down to the leading CMS, that has the features which will address our pain points and make our organization more productive, which may lead to saving your money and time as well.

Content Management system is an application utilized to control and work with the content materials inside an online website. It permits you to do all this without the need of any specialized expertise just like back-hand coding, HTML expertise and so on. A simple way is that you log in on to the application and you can add or modify the website information currently uploaded. As a consequence, this system facilitates you in keeping your website fresh, new and up-to-date for your site’s visitors. It’s an effective tool for beautifying a website by organizing data and enhancing easy navigation. It is a big boon and advantages for the websites which are based on content with regular updates with fresh content.

The following are some features of content management systems:

• It’s main feature is to import and create the documents and also multimedia material.
• It identifies all the key users and their roles.
• The quality of being able to perform and the quality that permits or facilitates achievement or accomplishment of assigning the roles and responsibilities.
• The capacity to assign the duty to different instances of content categories or types.
• The definition of workflow tasks often coupled with messaging so that content managers alter the modification in the content.
• It helps to track and manage multiple versions of a single instance of content.
• The ability of CMS is publishing the content to a repository to support access to the content.
• Versioning which means it groups of individuals who can work safely on documents and also recall the older versions.
• Its content goes through an assessment, review or quality assurance process which can be done under workflow process.

Integrating a content can be stored in a manageable way, separate from website design ‘templates’, and then delivered as web pages or re-used in different web pages and different document types.

According to the statistics, in 2001, Drupal was the oldest CMS out of bunch and it was a very powerful system that can be used for large and complex websites. Its market share reached upto 6.7%. Setup was easy. Popular brands which used this CMS are McDonald’s,The Economist and Oxfam. It was search friendly and out of the box and its choice of modules yielded successful results.

Later, by 2003 a new CMS was introduced and named as WordPress. It was initially designed for blogging, but from its conception it grew to be the top CMS and its market share raised to 53.8%. First takers of WordPress were ebay and CNN. By default it has good options with SEO, great open source plugins, more flexible and powerful. Its core system is updated frequently at the same time this can break your existing plugins.

Next came Joomla which made its entry in 2005. It is commonly classed in between the two, but it was not upto the mark as WordPress and Drupal and not user friendly either. It could hit the market share upto 9.2% only. Its layout design is in templates form and not as themes. Its setup was a bit hard to run when compared to Drupal and WordPress. Mtv, Barnes and Noble and Pizza Hut were the popular brands that used this CMS.

SEO required additional control for SEO settings and recommended SEO extensions and it costs money. Its pitfalls were greater than that of WordPress. Modules were hard to maintain and admin interface was quite confusing.